Evaluation and migration worksheet

Evaluate software before moving your studio

Use a repeatable trial scenario, explicit acceptance conditions and a staged migration record before replacing studio software.

Start with the evaluation section even if a migration already feels inevitable. Name the failed handoff, its current owner and the evidence that a process change cannot solve it. A completed worksheet can support a decision to keep the existing stack.

Use the same scenario for every candidate

Rehearse a fictional client journey from incomplete brief to ready request, review, approval and a subscription change. Separate what you personally observe from what documentation says or a vendor needs to clarify. Do not enter real client information into a trial without the required permission and safeguards.

The stack guide explains which records need an authoritative home. Record failures and manual steps as well as successful transitions.

Plan an exit before cutover

If a candidate passes, inventory active work, account permissions, files and billing responsibilities before importing. Define a rollback condition and a responsible person, then test a limited move. Retain a usable export under your agreed retention rules.

Do not treat a billing migration as an ordinary file copy. Confirm any payment credential or mandate transfer with the providers through a supported process. Use the billing guide to reconcile entitlement and active requests during the change.

Use this template

Download the plain-text version, or select the text below and copy it into your own document. Replace the prompts with your studio’s decisions.

Download .txt
STUDIOSIFT | SOFTWARE EVALUATION AND MIGRATION WORKSHEET
Use fictional trial data. Keep credentials outside this document.
Complete evaluation before deciding whether to migrate.

DECISION CONTEXT
Decision owner / affected delivery owner: ____
Current failed handoff and evidence: ____
Process-only repair attempted and result: ____
Capability that remains missing: ____
Required permissions / data restrictions: ____
Candidate / account plan / evaluation date: ____
Evaluator / test environment limitations: ____
Acceptance condition and unacceptable failure: ____

REPEATABLE SCENARIO (record observed outcome, not a feature tick)
Fictional client / request reference: ____
Incomplete brief -> intake / blocker outcome: ____
Complete brief -> ready queue outcome: ____
Priority change before start outcome: ____
Start under active-request limit outcome: ____
Blocked request / restart outcome: ____
Conflicting feedback -> consolidated instruction outcome: ____
Revised version -> explicit approval outcome: ____
Final files / history preservation outcome: ____
Pause or failed payment -> service-state outcome: ____
Guest access / account isolation outcome: ____
Export relationships and missing fields: ____
Manual steps and responsible roles: ____
Evidence reference / observation limitations: ____
Documentation-only claims / source / unresolved questions: ____
[ ] Same scenario used for each candidate
[ ] No trial action charged or messaged a real client
[ ] Failure cases included, not only the happy path
Evaluation decision: [ ] Keep current  [ ] Reject  [ ] Investigate  [ ] Pilot
Reason / decision owner: ____

RECORD OWNERSHIP AND MIGRATION INVENTORY
Client identity source / destination / stable reference: ____
Request status source / destination / mapping: ____
Approval history and version references: ____
Files / asset permissions / access owner: ____
Subscription and invoice responsibilities: ____
Integrations / event owner / duplicate handling: ____
Excluded or unsupported records and reason: ____
Export location / retention rule / access restriction: ____
[ ] Export opened and checked, not merely created
[ ] Relationships and identifiers reconciled
[ ] Payment credential or mandate transfer confirmed with providers

PILOT AND CUTOVER (only after approval)
Pilot scope / client communication owner: ____
Acceptance evidence required: ____
Write freeze / handover point / exception handling: ____
Authoritative system during transition: ____
Rollback trigger / decision owner: ____
Manual fallback and reconciliation method: ____
Duplicate-event prevention / recovery check: ____
[ ] Client and internal permissions checked in the new system
[ ] Active work, files and billing states reconciled
[ ] Team and affected clients know the new operating path
Cutover approved by / recorded date: ____
Old access revocation owner / retained-history location: ____
Post-move review date / unresolved issue owner: ____